Episode 16

full
Published on:

3rd Oct 2023

New Jersey Car Accident Lawyers Share How Fault is Determined in Automobile Accidents in New Jersey

Episode 16 of Jersey Justice™ Podcast: How Fault is Determined in Automobile Accidents in New Jersey

SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE

Make sure to subscribe to our YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/@Clarklawnj


SUBMIT YOUR QUESTIONS


Submit Your Podcast Questions If You Want Us to Answer Them on Our Show: questions@jerseyjusticepodcast.com


SUBSCRIBE

Subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also visit our podcast website to listen to all of the latest episodes at: JerseyJusticePodcast.com 


CONTACT US DIRECTLY FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE


Visit our Main Website for More Information About Clark Law Firm P.C. and our practice areas.

Call us at 1-877-841-8855 if you need legal assistance. 


CONNECT WITH CLARK LAW FIRM P.C. ON SOCIAL MEDIA 


Clark Law Firm P.C. on LinkedIn



Clark Law Firm P.C. on Facebook 


YOUTUBE 


Watch Jersey Justice Podcast on Our YouTube Channel


CONNECT WITH GERALD H. CLARK, ESQ.


Gerald H. Clark, Esq. on Twitter


Connect with Gerald on LinkedIn 


CONNECT WITH MARK W. MORRIS, ESQ. 


Connect with Mark W. Morris, Esq. on LinkedIn


Applying to Be a Guest on Our Show or Having Gerald and Mark as a Guest on Your Show


If you would like to be a guest on our show or have Gerald and Mark on your show or for media/press inquiries, contact Dimple at dimple@clarklawnj.com 


Transcript
Speaker:

Welcome to Jersey Justice, a

civil law podcast that shares

2

:

practical tips and stories about

personal and workplace injuries.

3

:

Join two of the brightest New Jersey

injury attorneys, Gerald Clark and Mark

4

:

Morris of Clark Law Firm, as they take

you behind the scenes of justice and civil

5

:

law, but first, a quick disclaimer, the

information shared on this podcast is

6

:

for general information purposes only.

7

:

Nothing on this site should be

taken as legal advice for any

8

:

individual case or situation.

9

:

This information is not intended

to create and does not constitute

10

:

an attorney client relationship.

11

:

Today, I'm here with Mark and

Stephanie, and we're going to be

12

:

talking about how fault is determined

in automobile accidents in New Jersey.

13

:

And also we're going to be talking

about accident reconstruction.

14

:

So welcome Mark.

15

:

Welcome Stephanie.

16

:

Thanks for having us.

17

:

Yeah, absolutely.

18

:

Absolutely.

19

:

So I'm excited to talk about this topic.

20

:

Mark, why don't we start the conversation

off with the , potential client wants

21

:

to know how is fault actually determined

in an automobile accident because a

22

:

lot of times it can be a he said she

said thing unless there's a dash cam

23

:

or there's evidence like the previous

episode we just recorded, what are your

24

:

thoughts on that from a legal standpoint?

25

:

Sure, so 1 of the 1st steps, like,

anytime we take a case on or we're

26

:

investigating cases, we'll look at the

police report and the police support

27

:

isn't necessarily like a be all end

all of who's at fault for the crash.

28

:

But a lot of times there's a lot of good

things in there that that can be helpful.

29

:

, there's motor vehicle

codes that they have.

30

:

If you ever look at a

police report, there's.

31

:

Numbers all up and down the sidelines

and they're on the sides of the document

32

:

and throughout, and those different

numbers actually mean something like there

33

:

will be a code for driver inattention.

34

:

There will be a code if.

35

:

There was sun in the eyes

or anything like that.

36

:

So we'll almost always start by

looking at the police report.

37

:

You know, again, someone

may have gotten the ticket.

38

:

A lot of times we see a careless driving.

39

:

Sometimes you see reckless driving or

unsafe driving, but again, that ticket's

40

:

not automatically going to come in.

41

:

And a lot of times it doesn't

come in, in a personal injury

42

:

case, that's a big thing.

43

:

There'll be witness statements

every once in a while, but, but

44

:

really it comes down to, there's.

45

:

Only so many different types of

auto cases, you'll have like a

46

:

rear end hit a left hand crash.

47

:

Maybe someone runs a stop sign

runs through a red light or what?

48

:

And just kind of doing it over the years.

49

:

I know Stephanie can talk about it too.

50

:

Is you get a sense like if it's a

rear end collision, it's almost always

51

:

100 percent the defendant's fault.

52

:

I mean, I have case after case now

where it seems to be more of like a

53

:

relatively new phenomenon where instead

of just saying like, Hey, yeah, rear

54

:

end collision, they give an excuse.

55

:

Like one guy says my foot cramped, you

know, someone else was like the floor,

56

:

the mats came up and I couldn't hit

the brake pedal, just things like that.

57

:

But at the end of the day, New

Jersey law is pretty straightforward.

58

:

You're responsible for

what's in front of you.

59

:

You have to maintain a

safe following distance.

60

:

If someone stops in front

of you and you hit them.

61

:

It's almost always still your fault,

but sometimes that will come into play.

62

:

If there's like a stop short

allegation, like say it's a three

63

:

car pile up our cars in the middle.

64

:

If the car in front of them stop short,

and then the person behind our client

65

:

rear ended them, they hit into the car in

front, you know, every once in a while,

66

:

there could be a small percentage of fault

put on the person that stopped short, but.

67

:

That's not automatic, and then as crazy

as this is, even if you're going through

68

:

an intersection where there's a green

light going through an intersection

69

:

where you don't have a stop sign, you

still have an obligation to make proper

70

:

observations before you're going through.

71

:

So, pretty rarely, but every once

in a while, we'll see, like, if the

72

:

case goes to arbitration or something

like that, they could put some fault

73

:

on our client who went through a

green light or went through an.

74

:

Intersection without a stop sign,

just because he's still an obligation

75

:

to make proper observations.

76

:

I don't necessarily agree with that, you

know, and I'm sure Stephanie too, like if

77

:

we go to arbitration and our client's got

a green light mind in their own business,

78

:

and someone runs through a red light and

slams into him, like we showed in that

79

:

video clip before, I don't really think my

client should have done anything different

80

:

or, or what, but that's really it.

81

:

Um, at the end of the day, we've,

we've talked about to a lot, like

82

:

Jerry mentioned on one of the last.

83

:

Episodes, like if it's a rear end hit,

they'll still blame our client, like

84

:

throughout the case, say they should

make proper observations, whatever it

85

:

may be, and then get to trial and say,

Hey, you know what, we admit fault.

86

:

And that's not now because they're

trying to be like good guys.

87

:

There's strategic reasons behind that.

88

:

But that's really kind of it.

89

:

Starting points, the police report,

just from doing this, you know, there's

90

:

different jury instructions on different

mechanisms of how crashes occur.

91

:

And then sometimes too, like we'll even.

92

:

If I share my screen real quick, I could

show you like, there's a diagram every

93

:

once in a while in these police reports

that give an indication of what happened.

94

:

Um, let me know when you can see this.

95

:

All right, can you see what's up there?

96

:

Yeah, now we can.

97

:

All right, so this is vehicles

are numbered, you know,

98

:

vehicle one, vehicle two.

99

:

There's almost always a

description of what happened.

100

:

You know, it says like.

101

:

Driver 2 is traveling east, Highway 36,

vehicle 1 came on Eatontown Boulevard,

102

:

struck his vehicle on the driver's side.

103

:

Vehicle 1 then ran off the

road and struck a one way sign.

104

:

Driver 1 said he was crossing Highway 36.

105

:

Driver 1 said he thought he

had a green light signal.

106

:

So you move down to the police

report, it says multiple witnesses

107

:

in the area say that Driver 2 had

the green light, Driver 1 had the

108

:

red light, so that's a good fact.

109

:

In this case, because we've got driver tip

in this particular case, it says dash cam

110

:

video was also submitted on this case file

showing vehicle to had the green light,

111

:

which again, that's very helpful to us.

112

:

That's rare that that happens.

113

:

But so, in a case like that, where you've

got multiple eyewitnesses, you've got dash

114

:

cam footage, and it seems pretty clear

that vehicle 1 had a red light ran through

115

:

the red light and hit into our client.

116

:

I don't really see that being a case

where there would be much liability

117

:

that that could get, put on our client.

118

:

But again, last episode, we went

through, we read the discovery responses

119

:

from the defendant insurance company.

120

:

And they blame our client up and down, say

they should have watched, you know, where

121

:

they were going, follow motor vehicle

codes, all things like that, which,

122

:

which happens in, in all these cases.

123

:

So this one was a little bit more

straightforward than we're used to,

124

:

but sometimes if it's like a more

complicated case, or if it's a really

125

:

bad crash or really bad collision, like

fatalities or catastrophic injuries,

126

:

the police will bring out like a

fatal crash reconstruction unit that

127

:

does a way more detailed analysis.

128

:

Or we'll go out and hire an expert that

that does something along those lines.

129

:

I think Stephanie had a case

like a few years back, that

130

:

that she can talk more about.

131

:

But my understanding, I just.

132

:

Remember from talking with her about

it like it was a girl that was crossing

133

:

the road I think it was nighttime and

it was a really really like bad crash.

134

:

She got real hurt and I don't know enough

about it Stephanie you could tell like if

135

:

you guys had a good report like this So

I did have one of those cases that were

136

:

similar to what you're saying, which is we

received the case in from another attorney

137

:

and the police report was not really

favorable to our client and the other

138

:

attorney was like, I don't think this is

a case, but Once we started digging into

139

:

it, we realized that there was more to it.

140

:

And so what it involved was a young woman

and her friends were getting off a bus.

141

:

Over in freehold, maybe like three

to three in the morning, maybe

142

:

about three o'clock in the morning

and, , they got off the bus and they

143

:

were starting to cross route nine.

144

:

they were in a crosswalk.

145

:

But it was in dispute of whether

they had the right to cross and

146

:

whether the little person was lit

up telling them they could cross.

147

:

And what happened was a woman, she

worked for a paper delivery and she

148

:

had just picked up the papers and she

was on the way to go deliver them.

149

:

And she hit the first person

that my client was with.

150

:

And then she hit my client.

151

:

They went flying, severely injured.

152

:

They had to be airlifted.

153

:

My client had really bad injuries.

154

:

We got the police report.

155

:

They had to do what

Mark was talking about.

156

:

They had to do a detailed investigation.

157

:

A shoe was found here.

158

:

A piece of clothing was found here.

159

:

And it was all marked off,

and it was all measured.

160

:

And when it came to, it did appear as

if they were in the crosswalk, and they

161

:

were kind of about halfway into the

roadway, which is relevant for New Jersey.

162

:

So even if they would have had, even

if the other driver had the green

163

:

light, it was still relevant that

they were halfway into the crosswalk.

164

:

So we kind of did a little discovery.

165

:

Deposed the defendant and she was

this little tiny, tiny woman who could

166

:

barely see over the steering wheel.

167

:

So when we saw pictures of her car

inside her car, first of all, there was

168

:

just crap everywhere, drinks and stuff.

169

:

Papers were in the back and she had to

sit on a thing just to lift herself up

170

:

So I'm not sure whether she even saw

our clients when she was deposed This

171

:

is one of those cases where sometimes

it goes the right way when you have

172

:

a case that seems clear cut against

your client But this woman this driver

173

:

was not the least bit sympathetic.

174

:

She said I thought I hit a deer I

was the one that was up Meaning her,

175

:

she was the one that was so upset.

176

:

She didn't know what happened.

177

:

She thought it was a deer and, you

know, and I explained to her, well,

178

:

once you found out it was Two people

that you hit then what did you do?

179

:

She was oh, I was just so upset So it

was all about her which is super helpful.

180

:

I'll get to that second We did not have

to go to trial But it was going to be

181

:

helpful that she was not sympathetic

a jury would not be sympathetic to her

182

:

Just cut the way she portrayed herself.

183

:

So as we were doing a little bit more

digging That's when we learned, like I

184

:

said, see, seeing pictures of her car.

185

:

Hey, were you delivering newspapers?

186

:

And so then once that happened, then we

brought in the newspaper carrier and they

187

:

tried to say, Oh, she wasn't within our

control, but you know, you only have.

188

:

Access to her, you know, you're only

entitled to go after her car insurance,

189

:

which was only a hundred thousand dollars

So once we started doing some depositions

190

:

and the questions then surrounded whether

The the paper carrier controlled her

191

:

actions meaning that they told her what

time to pick up the papers They told

192

:

her exactly how to deliver the papers.

193

:

They told her what route to take and

so once we determined that then we were

194

:

able to bring the newspaper carrier

in We also had our own investigator go

195

:

out there and what he did, which was

kind of interesting because the other

196

:

driver was saying, Oh no, I was going

to speed limit, I wasn't going too fast.

197

:

And so what he did is one of the

things he went out and did an

198

:

analysis over like an hour.

199

:

hour and a half for three days and saw

that people normally go a certain speed.

200

:

And so we were able to see, Oh, okay.

201

:

So the normal person is going

10, 15 miles over the speed

202

:

limit during that time period.

203

:

So it was most likely that

she was also speeding too.

204

:

So that was super helpful

with respect to that.

205

:

Our client was a doll.

206

:

She was, like I said, she

was seriously injured.

207

:

She had a hard time getting

through her deposition.

208

:

So we just had to keep taking breaks

and keep walking her through it.

209

:

That case ended up settling for 500,

000, probably could have settled

210

:

maybe a bit more if the liability.

211

:

Was clear cut and that kind of goes along

with what Mark was saying in the beginning

212

:

if that would have been a case where she

was in a car and she was rear ended or

213

:

she clearly had the crosswalk sign and

she was driving and then this, I mean,

214

:

she was walking on the crosswalk and this

driver blew a red light, then it would

215

:

have been a whole different story, but

when you're settling it or when you're

216

:

going to trial, there is some liability

that is assessed against this Mike, our

217

:

client who It appears walked against a

red light, but it was still a very, very

218

:

good settlement for that type of case.

219

:

Yeah.

220

:

And Dimple too, I don't want to, I may

have just taken this for granted, but

221

:

like why it matters, like percentages of

fault, like Stephanie's talking about how,

222

:

like her client could have been blamed

for, you know, going against a red light.

223

:

Like if she was found more than

50 percent at fault, then she

224

:

would get nothing in the case.

225

:

And if there was like, you know,

the case went to trial and a jury

226

:

came back and gave a verdict where,

say they awarded 100, 000 and they

227

:

determined that Stephanie's client

was 30 percent at fault, like

228

:

she'd only be able to get 70, 000.

229

:

So the recovery gets discounted by

whatever percentage of fault you are.

230

:

And that's what.

231

:

The law is in New Jersey, like some

States, it's contributory negligence,

232

:

where if you're one iota at fault,

you get nothing like I had a case one

233

:

time that got transferred to Maryland.

234

:

That was the law down there,

which is really, really tough.

235

:

New Jersey's comparative

fault, which is good.

236

:

So as long as you're not more than 50

percent at fault, you can recover since

237

:

it appears she went against the crosswalk

indicating that she was free to go.

238

:

She could have most likely.

239

:

Then more than 50 percent at fault,

she was very happy with that, but

240

:

that was a case where originally when

we looked at the police report, it

241

:

seemed like, Oh, this is not a case.

242

:

This is not a good case.

243

:

The prior attorney had said now hands off.

244

:

And then once we kind of dug into

it a little bit more, got our own

245

:

investigator, did a lot of depositions.

246

:

Found out some little holes in the story.

247

:

You know, we actually actually deposed

the bus driver and everybody up to that

248

:

point had said, Oh yes, your clients,

they did not have the right away to walk.

249

:

The driver had a green light, but

this bus driver, he let them off.

250

:

And as he started pulling away.

251

:

I asked him, did you look up

and see what the light was?

252

:

And he said, yeah, I think it, I

think the other driver might've

253

:

had a red one, but I'm not sure.

254

:

So it gave me a little bit of a

doubt where it was like, okay,

255

:

everybody else is saying it.

256

:

She, the driver definitely had a green.

257

:

And then this bus driver was like,

no, she might've had the red.

258

:

And so then, which in our case created

a nice little question of fact, because.

259

:

Maybe my client didn't

go against the red light.

260

:

So little nuances like that are super

important and taking depositions and

261

:

finding little nuggets like that,

that can help your client and help

262

:

your case are why we do what we do.

263

:

So I was sitting here as you were

talking about, like doing the deposition,

264

:

this case was way pre COVID, right?

265

:

Like this was back in 2016.

266

:

So I picture because depositions

for the past three plus years

267

:

have all been over Zoom.

268

:

Like if that had been a depth over

deposition over zoom, you may have not

269

:

even known that she was this like five

foot, nothing person, like I'm seven

270

:

feet tall, I'm sitting in this chair

or I'm, you know, four foot eight.

271

:

There's no way to know.

272

:

So that probably made a big

distinction too, because it paints a

273

:

totally different picture, a totally

different analysis of the case.

274

:

Like if you're just picturing

someone going along, you're like,

275

:

what, like, what could happen?

276

:

But then you're picturing some

little old lady or just not

277

:

assuming she's old or what picturing

someone like down like that.

278

:

That's a totally different analysis.

279

:

Absolutely.

280

:

And that's why also discovery is great

when you get photos of the, um, cause the

281

:

police did a really thorough investigation

and they had photos of her car.

282

:

And like I said, it was not only a mess,

but then there was a big pad on her seat.

283

:

I mean, like, like three phone books.

284

:

Big.

285

:

And I remember saying to her, do you,

do you need to sit on that to drive?

286

:

And she was like, yeah.

287

:

And then, So I think I literally

think that's exactly what happened.

288

:

She was this little tiny

lady could barely see.

289

:

And it was dark and you know,

they allegedly had dark clothing

290

:

on my client and a friend.

291

:

Stephanie does.

292

:

And this is like a little hype for

her, but she does such a good job

293

:

kind of peeling off like the layers

of the onion of cases like this.

294

:

Like she's saying, she took it over

from an attorney that rejected it.

295

:

And then goes and gets a half

a million dollar recovery.

296

:

And just even like talking about

noticing that there's a bunch of

297

:

newspapers in the car and like,

were you delivering newspapers?

298

:

Because if you're doing something in

the scope of your employment, that opens

299

:

up another potential layer of insurance

coverage, which is normally going to

300

:

be much higher than someone's just.

301

:

Personal auto coverage, so just to even

get into that ballpark of another layer

302

:

of coverage was a great step because

these crosswalk cases are not easy.

303

:

You talk about like

apportioning liability.

304

:

I had 1 where a girl was

crossing and same thing.

305

:

It was dark out.

306

:

I think she was going against

the light or came out.

307

:

She was going against the light, but

she was like:

308

:

through the intersection when she got hit.

309

:

So that was a fact that

was kind of helpful.

310

:

And the guy that hit her was like 88,

89 years old or something like that.

311

:

So that was kind of another factor

that was like, Hey, look, you know,

312

:

reasonable person probably would have

seen her it's kind of helpful there.

313

:

And then it, it matters to like

what the insurance coverage was.

314

:

I think in my particular case,

it was like a hundred thousand

315

:

dollars policy or maybe even less.

316

:

And she had a ruptured globe to her

eye, which is like a nasty injury.

317

:

And the insurance company, their

analysis is going to be, would

318

:

probably be more expensive to fight

that case than just to pay out.

319

:

Like Stephanie's case, it's like,

that's not like a, ah, here you

320

:

go type of money to give out.

321

:

Like that's a really, really good

result in a, in a tough case.

322

:

But I'll tell you another

kind of funny story.

323

:

I had a client who was also hit

in a crosswalk by another old

324

:

gentleman who was small and he

was properly in the crosswalk.

325

:

And.

326

:

driver that hit him only

had a 15, 000 policy.

327

:

And I remember showing up

at the deposition and I was

328

:

like, what do you people do?

329

:

And why are you not tendering the 15?

330

:

He's like, ah, we probably

will after the deposition.

331

:

I said, all right, I'm deposing

the guy really nice old guy.

332

:

And so I'm kind of asking him

like, what were you doing that day?

333

:

And ended up coming out that

he was delivering auto parts.

334

:

I asked the question, were you in the

course and scope of your employment?

335

:

I phrased it a little bit differently.

336

:

Were you working at that time?

337

:

Had you just had delivering?

338

:

And he was like, Oh, yeah, yeah,

I was working and I remember his

339

:

counsel was like, you were working

and I was like, you were working.

340

:

Well, I mean that case ended up settling

for eight hundred thousand So had we

341

:

not dug that dug into that a little

bit and that was actually a really fun

342

:

one in the respect of the auto parts

place This guy had a punch in like

343

:

an old fashioned time punch card So I

requested all of his punch cards for

344

:

like a year before this incident, right?

345

:

And including the day of the incident,

every other time, every other

346

:

time the guy worked from 8 to 4.

347

:

30, but on this day, and it was an

actual punch out, but on this day,

348

:

he allegedly clocked out at 3 p.

349

:

m.

350

:

And that was the only time

card in all of them that was

351

:

handwritten with the guy's initials.

352

:

So take it as you will, which I took it as

the auto parts place actually, you know,

353

:

it's said that he was clocked out at that

exact time before the incident, meaning

354

:

he wouldn't have been in the course and

scope of his employment at the time of.

355

:

That he hit my client.

356

:

That was like time card, time card.

357

:

It was probably 50, 60 time cards.

358

:

I had to show the guy and

each one was the same thing.

359

:

That was a good one.

360

:

That one settled for,

I think over 800, 000.

361

:

Yeah.

362

:

Like you can't help, but have these

like soapbox moments kind of when you're

363

:

doing this, like to call it, but like

play, everyone thinks plaintiff, you

364

:

picture like, Oh, the guy that goes and

slips on ice and it's like, Oh, great.

365

:

I'm going to go get like money

out of this, that example.

366

:

Just doesn't even really stand out

as something that ridiculous because

367

:

it happens in so many of these

cases, like construction cases.

368

:

You have to file motion after motion

to get like the contract for the job.

369

:

It could be like a multi

million dollar job.

370

:

And they're like, oh, there's no contract.

371

:

Oh, there's no safety plans.

372

:

And then 3 court orders later,

they're like, okay, here you go.

373

:

Here's the 200 page contract.

374

:

Here's, you know, 1000

site photos and like.

375

:

All our safety records, but it takes

like thing after thing after thing.

376

:

And what Stephanie is talking

about, there's sometimes it's

377

:

a jury charge that, that deals

with like spoliation of evidence.

378

:

Like if you get rid of evidence to try

and thinking it will help the case, like

379

:

the jury can be charged against that, but

like fabricating evidence or people think

380

:

that that could be, you know, it's going

to end up helping them out, but you get

381

:

good attorneys that pick up on that stuff

and dive into it and it backfires so bad,

382

:

or like it makes the case so much worse.

383

:

Like Stephanie picking up on that and

going exploring that, like everybody,

384

:

well, you would hope everybody sees

through that, what that is, and

385

:

like, that adds value to the case.

386

:

Like that doesn't mean the guy's

injury is worse or what, but like

387

:

everybody's analysis involves

what's a jury going to do.

388

:

Every way we look at a case is like,

what's going to happen at trial.

389

:

How would a jury perceive this?

390

:

It's one thing that the

guy got really hurt.

391

:

It's another, then that the defendants

in the case are trying to cover up

392

:

evidence to stop this guy from getting

like fair compensation for what happened.

393

:

Like that should piss people off.

394

:

Like that should get jurors like upset.

395

:

And like an angry jury for

us is like, is a good jury.

396

:

Yeah, that's a great point.

397

:

What I love is it's finding the loophole

and Stephanie's so thorough and Really

398

:

noticing the details of what matters in a

case like sometimes It's like the smallest

399

:

thing and someone else may overlook

that can make the biggest difference in

400

:

What's gonna be the outcome of that case?

401

:

So thank you for sharing that

Stephanie Yeah, those like,

402

:

what do you mean by that?

403

:

Or like, like, why do you say that?

404

:

Questions sometimes can open up such

like doors that you would never expect.

405

:

Yeah.

406

:

So that's just awesome.

407

:

And Mark, did you have anything else?

408

:

I think that's really it.

409

:

Like Stephanie talked about, it

looks like this was really thorough.

410

:

The client had taken a bunch of pictures.

411

:

It looks like we sent.

412

:

Multiple investigators out there,

one like early on in the case just to

413

:

document the area and then another.

414

:

I think, did you end up doing a

crash reconstruction in the case?

415

:

Stephanie?

416

:

We didn't have to do a cross

reconstruction because the police

417

:

did a thorough got it direction.

418

:

Like I said, the point that helped

us in their crash reconstruction

419

:

was where the initial impact was.

420

:

was, and it showed the initial

impact was in the crosswalk

421

:

in the middle of the road.

422

:

And in New Jersey, if you are halfway

in the middle of the road in a

423

:

crosswalk, even if the driver has a

green light, they're obligated to stop.

424

:

Um, so it was very important for

us to show that they were in the

425

:

crosswalk and it happened almost

middle of the way through the road.

426

:

It all like comes down to as well,

again, again, I guess just jumping up

427

:

on a soapbox, like it's just fairness,

like who the heck hasn't crossed

428

:

at a crosswalk when there's a green

light, you look like, is it safe?

429

:

So that from what I would understand

about that, like, if you're halfway

430

:

through crosswalk, that doesn't just

give the oncoming driver card bonds

431

:

to the slam into you, you got to

make proper observation and there's

432

:

jury instructions up and down.

433

:

Like the law that the judge would read

to the jury at the end of the case about

434

:

whether someone's in a crosswalk, not

in a crosswalk, whether they've got the

435

:

right away or don't have the right away.

436

:

So it's not like, yup, you automatically

win just cause you're in a crosswalk

437

:

or Nope, you automatically lose

because you weren't in a crosswalk.

438

:

And I do have like, it would probably

take me a second to pull it up.

439

:

So it might not make sense, but the

idea of like what a crosswalk is

440

:

a lot broader than you would think

to, it's not just the actual, like.

441

:

Stephanie, when it comes to determining

fault in accidents, right, what

442

:

type of car accident is the most

difficult to prove who was at fault?

443

:

Is there a particular type?

444

:

Because like Mark was saying

earlier, you get hit from behind.

445

:

It's usually the person who hit him.

446

:

It's their fault.

447

:

But is there a particular scenario where

it is hard to determine who is at fault?

448

:

We actually have a new case right now

where both of them are saying that they

449

:

had the green light in an intersection

with our client saying she had a

450

:

green light, the other client saying

they had green light and they don't,

451

:

there's no cameras, the police, they

actually did not interview a lot of

452

:

the witnesses because they said they

didn't have time apparently, but there

453

:

were some witnesses that actually

witnessed that the other driver went

454

:

through the green light and we're

trying to find one of those witnesses.

455

:

So that one's going to be a

little bit more of a challenge.

456

:

We had an actual witness or a lot of

times they have the video cameras in the

457

:

intersection that makes it much easier,

but that's definitely a hard case.

458

:

A left turn case.

459

:

If our client's coming out and making

a left turn and somebody is coming from

460

:

their left, , I had one of those cases

was a few years ago and it was a really

461

:

nice old guy and he was coming out

and making a left and the other driver

462

:

hit him and automatically off the bat.

463

:

You.

464

:

You would think, well,

your guy was making a left.

465

:

He should have, you know, and the other

woman had the proper right of way.

466

:

But once again, we kind of did a little

digging and she was on her way to school.

467

:

She was a school cafeteria aide.

468

:

And so I subpoenaed the records

for the school and showed that

469

:

she was supposed to get there.

470

:

a lot earlier than she was going

to be getting there, which kind of

471

:

supported our theory that she was

speeding up and over that hill.

472

:

That definitely helped.

473

:

And then we ended up settling

that case for the policy, but

474

:

those are definitely tough cases.

475

:

Yeah.

476

:

I think I covered a

deposition on that case.

477

:

I remember that.

478

:

Which again, that's awesome.

479

:

That's peeling back the onion layers.

480

:

I'm telling you, this isn't like, again,

soapbox and like self promotion, but

481

:

like, there's not a lot of attorneys and

law firms out there that are going to

482

:

take that extra step with an auto case

like that, that Stephanie just talked

483

:

about, like subpoenaing the defendant's

employment records to show that she was

484

:

late for work, that was a case from what

I recall, where like every case it's,

485

:

you know, who's at fault, what are the

injuries, what's the insurance coverage.

486

:

Almost always one of those things

is lacking, like are missing.

487

:

So I would imagine in that case, the

issue, the thing that was like, you know,

488

:

the biggest fight was probably liability.

489

:

So like a lot of people just go, nah,

you know, we'll settle this real cheap

490

:

or be like, we're not going to take

this case or take a deposition, but like

491

:

not go that extra step that Stephanie

went and by getting those records

492

:

again, like, ladies and gentlemen,

the jury, my client pulled out and the

493

:

defendant was speeding and hit her.

494

:

Okay.

495

:

Like, whatever, like says you,

you're trying to get my ladies and

496

:

gentlemen, my client look both ways.

497

:

So no one was coming.

498

:

The defendant who works

at a school, she's late.

499

:

She's rushing.

500

:

She's going downhill, you know,

comes out of nowhere, slams into

501

:

her, you know, slams into the client.

502

:

Like that's way more compelling.

503

:

And that's, again, I imagine probably

a huge reason why the defense in

504

:

that case settled, that's awesome.

505

:

I remember that case.

506

:

All right.

507

:

Cause he was a doll, a nice guy.

508

:

Which again, that matters too.

509

:

Absolutely.

510

:

Yeah.

511

:

The, the insurance companies

are assessing everything.

512

:

Like we tell our clients when

they go to a deposition, number

513

:

one, just tell the truth.

514

:

That's the most important thing.

515

:

You have to be honest.

516

:

There's good facts, bad facts.

517

:

In any case we can deal with

it, but just don't lie because

518

:

that will ruin the entire case.

519

:

So we always tell the clients not to lie.

520

:

And then we explained to the deposition

is as much about seeing how they present

521

:

and like what kind of person they are.

522

:

As it is about finding out like

what they recall and what happened.

523

:

So like, it goes into every analysis

that the insurance companies do, like.

524

:

You know, if we settle a case

or a defense attorney calls up,

525

:

look, now your client's real nice.

526

:

They presented really

well at your deposition.

527

:

Like that matters.

528

:

That adds value to the case.

529

:

Like the guy that's just like,

you know, this, I can't believe

530

:

this jerk slammed into me.

531

:

Like, that's not, you don't want that.

532

:

And you can only prepare people so much.

533

:

Like it's organically going to come out,

what type of person that they are and that

534

:

will add or take value away from a case.

535

:

You can tell we've had a few

of these crosswalk cases.

536

:

If I have this, like.

537

:

Children's book looking diagram of

like what is and isn't the crosswalk,

538

:

but you can see here and a lot of

Mark and I were talking about it.

539

:

It's called the stop and say stopped.

540

:

It's basically the if you're halfway

into the crosswalk, like Mark

541

:

showing you that you got to stop.

542

:

Yes, I had the case actually this guy

who's a retired postal worker and like

543

:

every day he went on the same route

did the exact same walk every day for

544

:

I forget how many years so his career

was spent walking around neighborhoods

545

:

as a postal worker and then like and

his retirement his favorite activity

546

:

was going for like these morning walks.

547

:

And he stepped out in an area like

here where my mouse is where there's

548

:

not necessarily like a white line

crosswalk or crosswalk that looks

549

:

like what's shown there and he stepped

out from behind a telephone pole.

550

:

The defendant said and started

crossing here and he got hit

551

:

and he got hurt really bad.

552

:

I think he was in a coma like for a

couple of days and it was only 100, 000

553

:

insurance policy, but they were like

fighting on that and fighting on that.

554

:

And I yeah.

555

:

Got this little diagram,

I'm pretty positive.

556

:

This is from the New Jersey department

of transportation or website.

557

:

So this is actually

like a legitimate thing.

558

:

I think I used it as a deposition

exhibit and they ended up tendering

559

:

the full policy in the case.

560

:

We've talked about the last

episode, how awesome it is when

561

:

you have like dash cam footage.

562

:

Pictures and all that.

563

:

It's one thing to stand up there and

say, ladies and gentlemen, you don't need

564

:

white lines for it to be a crosswalk.

565

:

Even if you're just crossing at the end

of the street, that counts as a crosswalk.

566

:

It's one thing to say that it's another

thing to put up this illustration

567

:

and be like, here you go, guys,

people go to movies, like they love

568

:

looking at pictures, all that stuff.

569

:

There's a reason they're very effective.

570

:

That's a great example, Mark.

571

:

Yeah, thanks for sharing that

because it just lays it out

572

:

visually for everyone to see.

573

:

Stephanie, is there anything

else that you wanted to share?

574

:

Sometimes it's just a matter of digging

in and finding the little nuances and

575

:

finding the inconsistencies in somebody's

statement or examining a picture.

576

:

And then you, you take it from there.

577

:

Yeah, I would agree.

578

:

I would say I can probably count

on one hand, maybe two, like the

579

:

amount of times we've had to get

like a crash reconstructionist

580

:

or reconstruction expert.

581

:

If it's like a rear end hit,

there's no reason to do that.

582

:

So I don't want people listening to think

like, Oh, you know, I was rear ended.

583

:

Why reconstructionist?

584

:

Because usually it's a lot of money.

585

:

And if it's not going to tip the needle

one way or the other, it's just, it's

586

:

a waste of everyone's time and time

and money, because that's a lot of

587

:

times of balancing in a case like this.

588

:

If it's a close call and if it's like

a, he said, she said, it's not even

589

:

guaranteed that a crash reconstruction

is going to make a difference.

590

:

So you just got to be selective

on, on the case you use them.

591

:

And yeah, I think Stephanie spoke to that.

592

:

Yeah, that makes sense.

593

:

That makes sense.

594

:

Well, this has been a great episode.

595

:

Thank you so much.

596

:

And for our guests out there, if you

do have questions for us, you can

597

:

submit your questions to questions at.

598

:

Jerseyjusticepodcast.

599

:

com to have your question featured on the

show where we will be answering it live.

600

:

And there you have it, folks.

601

:

Another episode of Jersey Justice Podcast.

602

:

If you're loving what you're hearing,

it's time to hit that subscribe button

603

:

on Apple, YouTube, and Spotify podcasts.

604

:

And don't forget to

leave us a review online.

605

:

Share this podcast with your

friends and become their legal hero.

606

:

Dive into more episodes

at Jersey justice podcast.

607

:

com are Clark law and j.

608

:

com.

609

:

And check out our show

notes for more information.

610

:

If you're navigating legal issues and

need a guiding light, or just a phone

611

:

call away, call us at 1 877 841 8855.

612

:

Again, 1 877 841 8855.

613

:

Until next time, Jersey justice

warriors stay empowered and informed.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Jersey Justice

About the Podcast

Jersey Justice
A Civil Law Podcast
Jersey Justice delivers insightful and engaging discussions on a range of civil law and policy matters in New Jersey, including workplace and construction site injuries, automobile crashes, commercial litigation, and other related legal matters. Jersey Justice is designed to keep listeners informed and educated about the complexities of civil law and policy in America.

Jersey Justice: A Civil Law Podcast is hosted by esteemed attorneys Gerald H. Clark and Mark W. Morris and delivers captivating and informative content through an interview-driven format, enriched with panel discussions that showcase the expertise of distinguished guest speakers from the legal field. The podcast is produced by Dimple Dang, Podcaster and Legal Marketing Expert.

About your hosts

Gerald Clark

Profile picture for Gerald Clark
Gerald H. Clark, Esq. is certified by the New Jersey Supreme Court as a Civil Trial Attorney and holds a distinction shared by less than 3% of New Jersey attorneys.

Gerald H. Clark, an accomplished and influential attorney in New Jersey's construction injury law, has made significant strides in the legal field. A long-time member of the Board of Governors of the New Jersey Association for Justice, he has served as counsel on numerous state and national class action matters, including a landmark consumer fraud lawsuit against Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, which resulted in a settlement valued at $1-3 billion.

Throughout his career, Gerald has successfully handled catastrophic loss and wrongful death cases, passionately representing deserving clients on a contingency basis to ensure access to justice. His strategic appeals in cases like Costa v. Gaccione and Fernandes v. DAR Development Corp. have influenced New Jersey's construction injury law for the benefit of workers.

Gerald has been recognized in the New Jersey Law Journal's "40 Under 40" and named a "Rising Stars Super Lawyer" from 2006-2012. Since 2013, he has been consistently honored as a "Super Lawyer" by Thompson Reuters, a "Top 100 Trial Lawyer" by the National Trial Lawyers Association, and a "Top 100 Litigation Lawyer in the State of New Jersey" by the American Society of Legal Advocates.

Mark Morris

Profile picture for Mark Morris
Mark W. Morris, a senior trial attorney, has been recognized on the Super Lawyers Rising Stars List each year since 2019 and has been named a “Top 40 Under 40 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyer” by the National Trial Lawyers Organization since 2019 as well.

Throughout his career, Mark has obtained remarkable settlements and verdicts for his clients, such as a $2 million settlement for a concert patron injured by a stage diver, a $1.325 million settlement for a motorist struck by an intoxicated driver, a $1 million settlement in a negligent security case and a $975,000 settlement in a worksite products liability case. Additionally, he has played a vital role in helping Clark Law Firm P.C. achieve numerous multi-million-dollar settlements and jury verdicts including a jury verdict of $2,579,000 for a construction worker who was injured when he was backed over by a utility truck.

Leading the firm's Consumer Rights Division, Mark has successfully prosecuted state and nationwide consumer class action claims, representing clients against businesses engaging in misleading or fraudulent practices. Notably, he worked on an obsolete motor oil class action that resulted in a $28.5 million settlement for consumers in 2021. Mark has also secured a $1 million consumer fraud class action settlement involving misleading business practices related to the service of process.

With a commitment to all aspects of litigation, Mark has demonstrated success in handling client intake, depositions, motion practice, arbitrations, mediations, and trial. He has won several cases before the Appellate Division and has litigated in both state and federal courts throughout New Jersey and the Southern District of New York.